The long-term red dirt review
Having reviewed the original baby blue Farley and now it’s cousin, the 9.8, I’d like to make the following suggestion. Let’s change the name. Farley, I get it, ok, sure. But, the direction Trek is moving this bike frame is anything but fat, slow, or a jiggly belly bouncing on a coffee table. It rolls, it’s sleek, it’s rigid, and, outside of the 3.8″ tires, it’s hardly recognizable as fat.
This is the first of two reviews. This story captures the heart and soul of riding the 9.8 on single-track dirt. The follow-up review will focus exclusively on the 9.8’s winter groomed single-track performance. Our objective is to uncover the year-round ability of the 9.8. The test Farley was a 19.5″, it’s rider is 6’0″ and 195 pounds.
The early impressions.
Taking the frame, fork, and wheel set out of the box I realized quickly the high amount of engineering firepower that went into the creation of this bike. Parts easily fell in line with their mating part. It was like a puzzle, but a puzzle that felt like placing pieces of museum quality carbon together. At no point did something not quite fit together. It was seamless, gorgeous, and glorious. “Wow” was a frequent word of choice as the bike began to take shape.
Another positive takeaway in the early minutes with the 9.8 was when I picked up the fork and steerer tube. When I picked up the original Farley’s fork my jaw dropped with how heavy it was. That memory was still firmly in my mind when I grabbed the 9.8 fork and I was gladly surprised to have a feather-weight in my hand. Well done Trek, great enhancement.
Trek doesn’t clearly tip their hand about, who this bike is made for, but from my assessment the Farley 9.8 is a contender for the person who wants to buy one bike, and ride it year round. For a person who wants the lightest possible year round bike, and a person who is excited about being able to change wheels sets based on the trail conditions. Believe it or not, in Minnesota, I’d consider this a great asset. In the winter I change tires weekly if not daily based on the snow conditions. Having the ability to add wheel sets to that mix provides added appeal. Having the added bonus of being able to go from 29+ to 27-Fat to 26-Fat is a real charmer if you are buying one bike, for all 12 months. (keep in mind, you might want multiple wheel sets)
The Farley 9.8 is a carbon masterpiece. Seriously, if there was a museum for fat-bikes, this bike would be the star attraction along that hall. It’s a “spare-no-expense” equipping of Trek’s OCLV mountain carbon frame with the first-class components to build up a spec list that is hard to match. Every component choice (outside of the stem) looks to be selected to shave weight and increase the visual design/aesthetics.
Components that stand out are the RaceFace Next SL carbon cranks and the 27.5″ tubeless ready Wampa carbon fat rims. Having switched to carbon rims on my personal fat-bike last year, it’s a major evolution forward from a “crawler” fat bike to a “rock and roll” fast bike. In short, this bike is one stunning plate of eye candy. It looks good, but how does it ride?
THE DIRT RIDE EXPERIENCE:
It was immediate recognizing the 9.8’s ability to roll uphill. It wasn’t 100% better than any other bike I’ve ever pedaled prior but it was noticeably improved. On average when going up a slope of 5% I’d estimate the 9.8 could roll farther uphill than any other fat-bike I’ve tested to date. As far as uphill climbing traction, it’s a fat-bike, it did awesome. And, with a fully rigid chassis, zero loss in effort was as always appreciated on the longer climbs.
I love a fat-bike on a downhill. I’m not talking about a downhill course riddled with cliffs, boulders, and drops. That would kill me. I’m talking about a good gravity based downhill flow trail. Solid and loose dirt, roots, rocks, a porcupine every once in a while. I never once thought about this bike on the downhill, meaning, I was instantly engaged with it. It made sense, it worked, I don’t think I have to over explain this, you’ll like it.
I sold my full-suspension 29er because my fat bike of choice out cornered it. On a popular smart phone app my 29er was generally a few seconds faster in terms of start/finish time to my fat-bike, but the 29er couldn’t hold a candle to the amount of cornering fun the fat-bike provided. When I saddled up the Farly 9.8 I was immediately anticipating that same level of cornering ability.
It wasn’t the same.
I had to talk to quite a few people about this. Some folks told me this is how a new fat bike handles, it’s more mountain bikie (Bikie is a term I guess and I just bought a new fat bike last year, it doesn’t handle like this.) I remember the early days of fat-biking when releasing some grip on the handlebars the wheel/tires would auto-steer me around the corner. Truthfully, I never minded that. So, perhaps this is my problem.
To state it candidly, in my opinion and YMMV the 27.5 Farley 9.8 did not possess the cornering ability of other fat-bikes I’d list as “the fat-bike godfathers of corning.”
Over the course of a few months of riding I did adjust my riding style/body position to gain a better cornering experience. I discovered getting my butt and weight off the back of the saddle in the corners and tipping my hips allowed the bike to carve a preferable line. Once I was accustomed to it, it worked, it was fine, it was just an added “to-do” versus how I turn my daily fat-bike (I simply lean, even with butt on saddle). I think what this body language did on the 9.8 was get the tire to finally get over on edge. With the additional height of the 27.5 wheel, turning over the tire on the sidewall took a different/even more aggressive riding style.
Having tested the Hodag prior, I also wonder about the correlation between the tire’s tread pattern and my cornering experiences. I wish the Hodag had one revision for summer riding — A taller, more aggresive sidewall tread lug for the front tire. In my opinion a more aggressive sidewall tread would allow the tire to bite into our red dirt on the single-track giving the front tire the “grip and rip” luxury I have become accustomed to. As there were no other 27.5″-3.8″ tires to test at this time, I can’t guarantee this would work. It would just be my first suggestion.
Ride Quality = Rigid+
I’ve been known to keep my fat tires inflated at a higher PSI than most and not mind the chatter. However, with the 9.8 I couldn’t take the beating. I quickly reduced the PSI to 15 rear, 10 front then 8 rear, 6 front. At the lower PSI the bike started to provide a better “suspension effect” through the fat tires, but not to the level I’m accustomed to in a 26″-4.0″ tire inflated to 15 rear, 10 front. The only factor I can conclude is the difference in wheel size (27.5″ vs 26″) and tire size (3.8″ vs 4.0″) reduced the “suspension effect” due to a larger circumference of the wheel and the reduced amount of tire around that larger wheel. I’d love to ride this bike with the spec 26″ Bontrager wheel and tire set for a compare and contrast point of view. Not only in terms of ride rigidity, but in terms of cornering.
The other item that is unconventional to most carbon frames is carbon has typically dampened the ride harshness quite a bit, especially with a carbon frame and wheel. However, here again, perhaps the OCLV carbon has less flex than the other carbon I have become adjusted to riding on. I’m not saying it’s bad, I’m only pointing out it’s different. If this was my only bike, I’d quickly come to know it and be accustomed to it within 3 rides. I know from the original Farley, Trek’s desire was for a fast fat bike. Race-like in nature. That means stiff.
Strangle Hold Dropout.
This feature is worthy of an Interbike award. What’s amazing about the Strangle Hold Dropout is when you adjust the placement of the rear axle the disc brake mount moves with it. Again, someone in engineering deserves an extra week of vacation. The rear of the frame certainly allows the precious room for the larger tires for the winter white season and I hope someone is sending those my way to test on our groomed single-track. The Strangle Hold Dropout also reminds me a downhill ski bindings when you could slide them forward for aggressive shredding, middle for easy going, and rear for powder. Seemingly similar in the fat-bike world. It’s impressive as it allows for that potential one-bike quiver. The summer dirt shredder and the winter corduroy carver. 3 different wheel sizes, 1 bike. The combinations are endless for those of us who love options.
The Bontrager Montrose Pro saddle. Weight-shaving galore and carbon rails to boot. Great looking saddle but it wasn’t right for me. YMMV. I couldn’t ride this saddle two days back to back. Well, I could, I just had to stand up on my pedals on the second day because sitting down was just too painful in all the unmentionable areas. You have to admit it’s a very cool looking saddle though. But when it comes to a saddle, I have to elect for “function” over “form” and to date WTB has me at hello with their Silverado series.
The Farley 9.8 is a great bike. It’s different than what I would have expected in terms of cornering and rigidity, but all in all, Trek threw their entire engineering team into developing not just a fat-bike, but a fat-bike that once again pushes this industry and segment forward. All of us as riders will benefit from this.
I applaud their effort. I’d love to see a different and slightly wider tire become available for summer shredding which could remedy the cornering issues that I experienced. Another consideration for an up and coming Farley 9.9 in the future would be the new Trek ISO Speed decoupler. This could come in handy for summer shredding to smooth out and make the dirt riding more comfortable. In the winter, rigidity isn’t going to be an issue, snow has a wonderful way of smoothing out the trail surface.
Other parting thoughts are 9.8 is DI2 electronic drivetrain capable. So if you have the money, Farley has the way. It’s also dropper post ready. I hope you see by now Trek basically thought through almost every possible scenario.
I look forward to the snow. Here in Minnesota our winter is still not here. The pictures shown here are our current winter appeal, minus a little bit of snow slush that still lingers from our one snowfall we received a week ago. I look forward to these larger rims on groomed single-track. I look forward to sharing with you all the results. I look forward to just riding a bike. It’s a serious joy.
Until then, ride happy.
Nice write up! Perhaps I’m just used to older fatbikes as well, but I noticed similar deficiencies when demoing the 9.8. It is very fast rolling, but doesn’t have that true grippy, cushy fatbike feel. I wish Trek would have released this bike with 26″ wheels.
Now that is interesting. I have the Farley 9.6 Carbon, and immediately felt it to be much more compliant than my 2014 Salsa Mukluk. My first time on singletrack was icy, but even then the bike felt like it cornered beautifully – and I still have the dropouts in the fully rearward mode (anticipating snow). I wonder if the main difference is in the wheels. I have the 27.5 Jackalope wheels – maybe your 27.5 carbon Wampa wheels are just that much stiffer.
Looking forward to adding my own thoughts on the bike after a few more weeks of riding.
I built up some 29+ with Chupracabra’s for my 9.8, super fun. Having that option in northern Michigan is were it is at.